Redefining Anti-Semitism

odal3

°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: The following article about redefining anti-Semitism, written in 2018, we regard as notable given the intervention by the current Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis in the November/December 2019 UK election campaign and which intervention lambastes the Labour party for its “anti-Semitism” and seems to imply that “a Labour victory in that campaign would be a catastrophe”. {1}

In other words, British Jews should support the Conservatives leader Boris Johnson whose Jewish ancestry {2} has, apparently, never been mentioned by the mainstream Media during this 2019 UK election campaign.

Is this intervention by the current Chief Rabbi one more example of the “social engineering” mentioned in the following article?

We believe it is, and which “social engineering” Myatt – in an appendix to his Mythos of Vindex {3} – described as “the manipulation and control of people by abstract social/political ideas. Our modern lifeless, multi-racial societies are the direct product of decades of social engineering, of social/political ideas and abstract doctrines made law.”

The modern re-definition of so-called “anti-Semitism” certainly seems to be an “abstract social/political idea”.

RDM Crew
2019

{1} https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/26/british-jews-corbyn-emigrate
{2} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/boris-johnson-his-jewish-credentials/
{3} https://regardingdavidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/myatt-mythos-of-vindex-v1.pdf

°°°°°°°

Redefining Anti-Semitism
A Tale For Our Times

The current political row about so-called “anti-Semitism” in the British Labour party is a relevant tale of our times for several reasons.

I. It is a relevant tale, firstly, because the term “anti-Semitism” is a fairly recent invention, dating from the 1870’s but only becoming common in English due to the anti-German propaganda that proliferated before and during the Second World War. {1} As defined in the Complete Oxford English Dictionary (Second edition, 1989) it means “hostility and prejudice directed against Jewish people, and the theory, action, or practice resulting from this.”

II. It is a relevant tale, secondly, because it reveals how influential and powerful certain Jewish advocacy groups are since they have for years lobbied the British government – and police forces and other official bodies – to accept the new definition of “anti-Semitism” invented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).

The IHRA’s definition is: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

However, as well of this definition, the IHRA helpfully provide examples of what according to their definition constitute the “crime” of “anti-Semitism”. Among their examples are the following:

° Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

° Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

° Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.

° Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Since this IHRA definition – and its examples – define things which it advocates and supporters consider to be “wrong”, morally reprehensible, it should be obvious that it enshrines an ideology; that is, it is a scheme of ideas relating to ethics, politics and society, and forms the basis of action and policy.

Furthermore, since this ideology, enshrined in the IHRA definition and its examples, is now increasingly being used by police forces, councils, and other official bodies, to determine if a “hate crime” has been committed, it is clear that there is a movement, not yet written in law but continually agitated for, to make things such as a “certain perception of Jews”, “holocaust denial” and criticism of Zionists and of the Zionist entity itself, punishable crimes in the modern West.

That this ideology – whose advocates and supporters seek to criminalise “a certain perception” that some other people do not like or approve of – is an assault on freedom of expression and freedom of belief should be obvious. That this assault is still not obvious to many is tribute to just how effective the propaganda of the Zionist lobbies and of “holocaust remembrance” lobbies is and has been, for such propaganda – repeated almost every day, every week, every year, since 1945 – is that “anti-Semitism led to the horrors, the inhumanity, of the holocaust and such horrors must never be allowed to happen again.”

Yet if – as those who write and speak in favour of historical revisionism claim and believe – the holocaust did not happen as portrayed in the holocaust literature then persecuting and criminalizing those who question or doubt it is repressive and intolerant. This intolerance was summed up following the criminal conviction in May 2018 in a British court of law of a singer – Alison Chabloz – just for singing songs questioning the veracity of the holocaust, with the leader of the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism declaring that “in Britain Holocaust denial […] will not be tolerated.”

In other words, advocates and supporters of a particular ideology demand that their zealous intolerance becomes official policy and is enshrined in the law of the land, just as they rejoice when someone is convicted in a court of law on the basis of the intolerant ideology they advocate and support.

It really does seem as if we in the West have not learned much from the religious intolerance of former centuries when those who did not believe in certain things – and who perhaps had “a certain perception” that differed from what was then the accepted, the non-heretical, norm – were persecuted and criminalized.

III. It is a relevant tale, thirdly, because it reveals just how intertwined the modern legend of the holocaust is (i) with re-defining “anti-Semitism”, (ii) with intolerant attempts to criminalize “a certain perception”, (iii) with support for and the survival of the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, and (iv) with the religious belief that the Jews were and are the “chosen people of God” and that therefore they have a God-given right and duty to create and then to live in the Zionist entity. Hence, of course, the Zionist “law of return”.

For without the legend of the holocaust the Zionist entity would either not exist or would not be supported as it is and has been – economically, financially, militarily, propagandistically and otherwise – by the wealthy nations of the modern West.

It should therefore come as no surprise that, in an unguarded moment, the then Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, Dr. Jakobovits, declared in 1982 that “The Jews were chosen to act as pathfinders for the world, and Israel has a special place as an instrument to effect the Jew’s social engineering upon the world.” {2}

Where by the term “social engineering” he meant and implied both (i) government and State efforts (through laws, propaganda and other means) to influence the attitudes and ideas of people and the structure of society, and (ii) efforts by the Media and special interest groups to bring about certain changes in society.

For re-defining the term “anti-Semitism”, criminalizing questioning or doubting the legend of the holocaust, and – among things – demanding that a certain ideology becomes official policy and is enshrined in the law of the land, most certainly amounts to social engineering.

Haereticus
23 July 2018 ev

{1} An example of such propaganda occurred in The Economist magazine dated 24th August 1935: “The Nazi Party stalwarts […] have all been leading an anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, anti-Protestant crusade.”

{2} The Guardian newspaper (London), 7th August 1982.

°°°°°°°


Applying Myatt’s Philosophy To The Real World

odal3

°°°°°°°

The following pdf document contains our essay Applying Myatt’s Philosophy To The Real World, issued in two parts in February 2019.

We argue that the modern terms – the denotata – “racism” and “hate-speech”, and what derives from them, such as “racist”, are examples of the Myattian principles that (i) denotata hide the physis (the nature) of living beings and thus the ontological relationship between living beings and between an individual being and Being itself, and (ii) such denotata depend on the supposition that named opposites exist and that implicit in such a supposition is a dialectic; that is, a real or assumed or a potential conflict.

We also suggest that such modern denotatum as “racism”, and “hate-speech”, derive from the ideological movements that have come to dominate the political life of the nations of the West; movements which Myatt wrote about in his earlier monograph Vindex: Destiny Of The West, published in 1984.

We conclude that Myatt’s apparently “above time” philosophy of pathei-mathos is ineluctably Western, pagan, and practical, and in essence opposed to the Magian abstractions – such as the concept of “racism” – that now dominate the nation States of the modern Western world to the detriment of our ancestral Faustian ethos.

Applying Myatt’s Philosophy To The Real World
(pdf)

Part One: Racism and Racist
Part Two: The Crusade Against Hate-Speech

°°°°°°°

Related:

Vindex: Destiny Of The West
(pdf, facsimile of 1984 text)

The Mythos Of Vindex
(pdf)

°°°°°°°


Vindex: Facsimile Of Original Text

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

Vindex: Destiny Of The West

Herewith a facsimile of Myatt’s seminal National Socialist text Vindex: Destiny Of The West as published in the January 1984 edition of the American Liberty Bell magazine edited by Virginia based George Dietz, a former member of the Hitler Youth who emigrated to America in 1957.

Vindex: Destiny Of The West
(pdf)

°°°°°°°°°


An Urban Legend?

David Myatt

Is David Myatt – as part of the O9A or otherwise – still encouraging people to undertake the culling of mundanes? Yes he is, or might be, at least according to a certain urban legend, and according to certain conspiracy theorists, as is described in the following recent article.

°°°°°°°°°

Kulty sú však súčasťou ľudstva, existovali vždy a niektoré z nich sa dokonca stali legendami. Jeden z takých kultov má názov Rád deviatich uhlov. Ide o skupinu anarchistov, ktorí vyznávajú myšlienky neonacizmu, no neštítili sa ani vrážd a ľudských obetí.

Rád deviatich uhlov, teda Order of Nine Angles (ONA), založil v Británii muž menom Anton Lang. Išlo o zlepenec rôznych okultistických skupín, ktoré v tých časoch vznikali. Lang dlhý čas cestoval po svete a vzdelával sa v oblasti náboženstiev a jazykov. Okolo roku 1970 ho však zlákala temná strana a Lang sa rozhodol páchať zločiny. V roku 1980 začal rád publikovať články, v ktorých tvrdil, že ich cieľom je oživenie keltského pohanstva. Svoje učenie napokon spísali v knihe The Black Book of Satan.

[David] Myatt sa narodil v Tanzánii a už od útleho veku sa venoval bojovým umeniam. Zaujímal sa taktiež aj o náboženstvá, fascinovali ho napríklad budhizmus a islam. Napokon sa z neho stal politický aktivista. Po čase sa pripojil ku skupine na čele s Colinom Jordanom, ktorý veril, že Británia by mala byť očistená od všetkých prisťahovalcov a Židia by sa mali vrátiť do Izraela. Myatt sa dokonca stal Jordanovým ochrancom.

V roku 1974 sa Myatt rozhodol, že sa osamostatní a vytvoril neonacistické hnutie s názvom National Democratic Freedom Movement. Čoskoro spoznal členov ONA a prijal myšlienku, že kresťanstvo je náboženstvom otrokov. V roku 1998 konvertoval na islam, neopúšťal však myšlienku neonacizmu.

Vďaka politickým aktivistom sa vplyv ONA čoskoro rozšíril aj mimo územie Británie do celej Európy. Ku kultu sa pridal napríklad aj francúzsky novinár Christian Bouchet. Ten neskôr v roku 1991 založil vlastné hnutie s názvom Nouvelle Resistance. Na Novom Zélande zas Kerry Bolton založil kult Black Order.

ONA o sebe hlása, že nevyznáva len jediný smer, ale je otvorená tak pre pravičiarov, ako aj ľavičiarov. Kult totiž tvrdí, že jeho cieľom je vytváranie chaosu a nebojí sa uchýliť k vandalizmu, aby to dokázal. Neznáša organizovanú spoločnosť a všetky jej inštitúcie.

Zdá sa, že kult dokázal zapustiť korene už aj v Amerike, kde skupinka ľudí založila tzv. Atomwaffen Division. Jej vodcom je James Cameron Denton, skupina je údajne dobre ozbrojená a ľudí do svojich radov láka napríklad aj na pozemkoch škôl za pomoci letákov. Atomwaffen Divison sa už dokonca vyhrážala aj vláde a je obvinená z vraždy študenta Blazea Bernsteina. Zabil ho Samuel Woodward preto, lebo Blaze bol homosexuál a Žid.
Cieľom ONA je nastoliť tzv. Nový Aeon. Tvrdia, že moderný svet je zlyhaním a je nutné vrátiť sa k starým kmeňovým tradíciám a nastoliť tak opäť poriadok. Spravodlivosť by mal nastoliť hrdina, ktorého členovia volajú Vindex. Okrem toho veria aj v existenciu niekoľkých temných bohov. Jedným z nich je Baphomet, ktorá je matkou aj ženou Satana. Práve Baphomet by mala byť tvorkyňou všetkých démonov.

ONA tvrdí, že ľudská obeta je akýmsi presúvaním energie, ktorú môžu využiť čarodejníci. Okrem toho tvrdia, že ľudská obeta je potrebná každých 17 rokov, aby sa udržala kozmická rovnováha. Zomrieť nemôže len tak hocikto, ideálne je, ak sa niektorý z členov sám rozhodne, že sa obetuje.

Možno by ste si mysleli, že kult je súčasťou minulosti. Niektoré zdroje však hovoria, že Myatt stále žije a nabáda mladých ľudí k vraždám a iným zločinom za účelom vykonávania rituálov.


Source: https://psych.interez.sk/poculi-ste-uz-o-rade-deviatich-uhlov-toto-je-ten-najnebezpecnejsi-kult-sveta-ktory-zial-stale-existuje/


Concerning The Vindex Mythos

David Myatt

Editorial Note: We publish here (in pdf format) an interesting and informative essay about David Myatt’s Vindex mythos, which Reichsfolk essay – with its study of Myatt’s Vindex: Destiny of the West and his Mythos of Vindex – shows that its basis is honor, an appreciation of the numinous, an understanding of the Magian distortion that has afflicted Western civilization, and an affirmation that National Socialist Germany was “fundamentally an instinctive and natural reaction to the dominance of the Magian ethos, and represented a mostly unconscious expression of the numinous, honourable, warrior ethos.”


Related:


A Review Of Myatt’s Mythos of Vindex

David Myatt

David Myatt’s tract The Mythos of Vindex – finally published in its entirety this year {1} – is something of a hybrid text; a rather strange mixture of pro National Socialist sentiment together with polemics not only directed at the things – such as the State – that made National Socialist Germany what it was and might have been had the Axis won the Second World War, but also directed at the things that made the West what it is now: to wit colonialism, industry, and technology.

For it is as if the author is torn between two weltanschauungen, as well he might have been given the date of its composition (1998-1999) and the dates of its revision (2002-2005). For the years 1998 to 1999 marked Myatt’s transition from a neo-nazi to a Muslim, while 2002 to 2005 were dominated by his travels in the Muslim world, his overt support for Osama bin Laden, the Taliban, and Hamas, and of course his strategy to bring neo-nazis and radical Muslims together to fight their ‘common enemy’. For the tract reads as if it was originally intended for a specific audience – neo-nazis and those belonging to neo-völkisch groups – but with Myatt trying to offer something for his Muslim readers; hence perhaps  the passages about the colonialism of the ‘White hordes’ (which are basically polemics directed at those foreign devils), his mention of the treatment of Muslims by those foreign devils, and his praise of the Mujahideen and of Mullah Omar.

There are also several apparent discrepancies in the text. For instance regarding the British Empire with Myatt dividing that Empire somewhat simplistically into ‘the old Empire’ (before the Victorian era, which began in 1837) and a later Empire, writing that “the true, respectful, civilizing mission of [the British] Empire gave way to a brute Imperialism based upon financial gain.” The old Empire he admires, the later one he lambastes even though he goes on to write that “to make the world truely civilized we need another Empire, created and maintained by honourable, idealistic people, who look to the examples of the Roman, the Islamic and British Empires for inspiration.” Perhaps he should have written ‘original British’ rather than just ‘British’.

Another apparent discrepancy is his praise for the tribal way of life in pre-colonial Africa which he says, without providing any dates, was “ruthlessly destroyed” by those damn “foreign devils” (the White Hordes of Homo Hubris) and yet he later writes, again without providing any dates, of British administrators ending “the bribery and corruption of officials which was endemic” in India.

Such quibbles aside, the main problem I find with the tract is that Myatt eulogizes the clan and the tribe, and rural life in general, and yet states several times that the fundamental aim of the new Imperium is the colonization of Outer Space. But just how would a society or societies composed of clans and tribes, and presumably a mostly rural way of life, achieve that without industrial factories, large corporations manufacturing technological products, large-scale – government sized – coordination and administration, and scientific, university based, research funded by a national-sized government which by necessity would have to tax its citizens to pay for such research, such universities, and such a complex administration? In addition, if profit was not the motive for such factories and such corporations then surely the only other option would be government funding, which leads one to enquire where and how would a government find the money? To pursue space-travel surely a prosperous and wealthy society – a nation-Sate, or several nation-States cooperating with one another – and thus a government or governments would be required. {2}

Which returns us to National Socialist Germany – a scientific and technologically advanced society with a national government – and what might such a society have achieved, in scientific and technological and social, terms had it been victorious in the World War Two. Which naturally leads to how National Socialist Germany came into being: through a political movement gaining political power.

Perhaps Myatt envisaged his Vindexian clans and tribes fighting and overthrowing a government and then forming a new government, for he does write of Vindex as “a modern and successful guerilla leader who devises new strategies and new tactics to defeat the armed forces of the Old Order,” and that “it seems increasingly likely that the first battles in the coming war against the forces of the Old Order will be urban ones and develope as a natural consequence of some urban gang gaining practical control of certain urban areas such that they become the effective and the visible forces of law and order in those areas.”

If that is indeed what he envisaged, as seems likely, then he perhaps should have spelled it out, as he did in earlier tracts such as his Practical Guide To Aryan Revolution in which he wrote about how to ferment chaos and insurrection and wrote of a guerilla campaign lasting at least a decade.

All that being said, The Mythos of Vindex has the potential to inspire a new generation of native Europeans who, seeing the failure over the past fifty years of right-wing political organization after right-wing political organization in places such as Britain, desire a new way to fight ‘the system’. At the very least it contributes, in a positive way, to the debate about neo-völkisch groups and their aims regarding reviving ancestral traditions and alternative ways of living.

R. Parker
May 2016

{1} Myatt’s tract is currently [May 2016] available as a pdf document at https://regardingdavidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/myatt-mythos-of-vindex-v1.pdf

{2} It has been brought to my attention (kudos to Pasi R and Scott L) that in two articles, dating from around 2009, Myatt theorizes about how a society based on clans might develop a new ‘acausal’ technology that, in his words, does not depend on “the unethical abstraction of the modern nation-State and the un-numinous ways of living which go with such an abstraction,” and thus does not “involve large national or supra-national industries”, and is not “reliant upon the usury, and the supra-national trade and commerce, which all modern States and nations depend upon.”

Extracts from the two articles are available at https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/clans-spaceflight-and-acausal-energy/


The Mythos Of Vindex

odal3

This is the first publication of the complete edition of David Myatt’s text The Mythos of Vindex, although various and sometimes substantial extracts from it have been published over the years. Written between 1998 and 1999, with some parts revised by Myatt between 2002 and 2005, it expands upon, refines, and develops the themes he wrote about in his 1984 pamphlet Vindex: Destiny of The West.

The Mythos Of Vindex
(pdf)